Inicio

Quienes Somos

Contactenos

Buscar Revista

Secciones

Indice Artículos

Editoriales

Enf. Latinoamérica

Gerencia En Acción

Literatura

Negocios

Mujer y Negocios

Tecno-Lógica

Naturalmente

Socio-Política

Revistas Previas

Arte

Medios Del Mundo

Tertulias

English

English Home

Contact Us

Article Archive

Political Issues

Social Issues

Economic Issues

General Articles

The Other Side

Origin

Poetry & Song

 

 

  On "Subject" mention article name and author

Report from Havana
Time for a Reality Check on
U.S. Policy toward Cuba

Jonathan G. Clarke and William Ratliff

Jonathan G. Clarke, a former British diplomat, is a research fellow in foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute. William Ratliff is senior research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

Report in PDF format. If you do not have Acrobat Reader you can download from here

Report

Executive Summary

Official U.S. and Cuban depictions of the effects of the U.S. embargo differ notably from Cuban economic reality. This report, based on the authors' recent visits to Havana and interviews with top Cuban officials, dissidents, and other private citizens, shows that the embargo is not responsible for Cuba's poor economic condition—as Havana claims—nor has it been effective at achieving Washington's goal of isolating the Cuban regime.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the consequent loss of massive aid and trade preferences, Cuba has established more developed relations with the outside world and introduced limited reforms in areas including trade, foreign investment, and tourism without renouncing socialism. Cuba is thus no longer backsliding, but neither is it flourishing.

A dense network of American contacts with Cuba has also developed. About 3,400 American business visits to Cuba took place last year, and 80,000 Americans are visiting the island annually, in addition to thousands of Cuban Americans who, along with other Cuban exiles, remit $1 billion per year to Cuba. Much of that activity violates the spirit, if not the letter, of U.S. sanctions law.

Interviews with leading dissidents also reveal a preference for engagement with the United States and little support for maintaining the embargo. Moreover, many dissidents oppose proposed U.S. legislation that would provide aid to human rights and other activists in Cuba because it would compromise their independence and legitimacy.

Current U.S policy toward Cuba is based on historical inertia, domestic political calculations, and emotionalism. The embargo will continue to be ineffective—especially given dwindling support for the policy, the ease with which Cuba gets around the sanctions, and the ways in which Cuba has been adapting to changing world conditions. The United States could help improve Cuba's poor human rights record and reveal Fidel Castro's regime as the main source of Cuba's economic troubles by lifting the trade and investment embargo, restoring the right of Americans to travel to Cuba, and rejecting any current or proposed official aid to groups inside Cuba.

Report

November 18, 2001

 Revista Inter-Forum is affiliated with (ICCAP)

Any reproduction in part or whole is strictly forbidden without the authors written authorization  

Top

 

Los artículos o contenidos de este Sito Web NO pueden ser reproducidos total o parcialmente sin previa autorización escrita del autor y/o Revistainterforum.com ® Copyright 2000-2009
Latin America Consulting & Communications LLC (LACC)

 The Contents of the site are intellectual Property of Revistainterforum.com ® Copyright 2000-2009 and or the the author.   Reproduction in part or whole of any of this material without written permission constitutes a violation of the law.
Latin America Consulting & Communications LLC (LACC)